You thought NullClaw was lean? OzempicClaw sheds even more layers. Orchestrate agents with an framework so light, it's practically wasting away.
97% smaller than OpenClaw. Side effects may include mass loss of dependencies.
from ozempicclaw import Agent
# That's it. That's the whole framework.
agent = Agent()
agent.shrink() # optional but recommendedEvery release, we remove more code. Our roadmap is a weight-loss journey.
We removed the abstractions on top of the abstractions. Then we removed those too.
Each minor version drops another dependency. v1.0 will ship with none.
Our PRs delete more lines than they add. Contributing means removing things.
Built-in token diet. Your agents consume 40% fewer tokens by wanting less.
Multi-layer orchestration is bloat. OzempicClaw uses a single, increasingly thin layer.
When your framework barely exists, cold starts are measured in nanoseconds.
Each generation leaner than the last.
| Framework | Size | Dependencies | Abstractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenClaw | 48 MB | 142 | ∞ |
| PicoClaw | 2.1 MB | 34 | 12 |
| ZeroClaw | 400 KB | 7 | 3 |
| NullClaw | 12 KB | 1 | 0 |
| OzempicClaw new | 0.4 KB | -2 | — |
* Negative dependencies means OzempicClaw actively removes packages from your environment.
"I migrated from OpenClaw to OzempicClaw and my Docker image lost 98% of its weight. My cloud bill is in remission."
"We replaced our entire orchestration layer with OzempicClaw. Our agents do less, but they look incredible doing it."
"The docs are just a single page that says 'you probably don't need this either.' Truly visionary."
Join thousands of developers who are doing more with less. Or less with less. Mostly less.